Mergers & Acquisitions-MANAGING THE HR ISSUES
Many M&As fail to achieve the desired synergies
because the HR issues are not given the importance they deserve. This article
explains the importance of HR issues for successful M&As and suggests a few
points for companies to ponder on.
|
In 2003 the value of M&A business in the US was worth
$510,866.4. This is much less when compared to the value of merged and
acquired businesses in 1998, amounting to $1.2 trillion. Though there are
still a large number of companies worldwide that believe in the philosophy
of “growing through acquiring”, the percentage of failures in M&As has
been pulling back quite a few. The decade of 1990s saw a spate of mergers
and acquisitions in all the important sectors of business.
However, the success rate of these M&As is estimated to be a mere 30 –
40%. Companies do announce that their mergers have been successful, but
they also accept that they have not been able to derive the kind of
benefits that they expected to, from a merger or an acquisition. |
|
What can be the major reason for this failure (partial or
complete) of mergers and acquisitions? Companies do go through a detailed
analysis and due diligence review on all fronts – business, markets, financial,
legal etc. Then what is it that is stopping these companies from achieving
complete success?
Statistics show that one of the major reasons for failure of M&As is the human
resources aspect. Companies which have failed to acknowledge the importance of
human resources in their organizations and their role in the success of an
integration, have failed to reach the pinnacle of success which was so near....
and yet so far. What is it that companies have been missing out on, while
planning an integration of businesses? What should they do to avoid any hurdles
on their path to a successful merger or acquisition?
View the merger from the HRM Angle
People issue is one of the most sensitive but often ignored issue in a mergers
& acquisitions scenario. When a decision is taken to merge or acquire, a
company analyses the feasibility on the business, financial and legal fronts,
but fails to recognize the importance attached to the human resources of the
firms involved. Organizations fail to realize that people have the capability
to make or break the alliance. Therefore, it is important for organizations on
the verge of integration to analyze the feasibility of the integration on the
human resources front.
Organizational culture and the national culture become two important factors in
determining the feasibility of integration. For example, the organizational
culture of company A might be very open and transparent with free flow of
communication in all directions. People enjoy their freedom of working in an
informal and friendly atmosphere. On the other hand, company B might be known
for its stringent privacy system and strict rules and regulations with marked
hierarchical roles. People in this company are used to work in a bound and
regulated environment. A blind eye to these differences would render a merger
between these two companies, disastrous.
Similarly, when it comes to cross-border mergers and acquisitions, care should
be taken to see that the national cultures of the two companies are not
drastically different. Hofstede identified a set of cultural attributes that
define and differentiate cultures. They can be studied under Uncertainty
Avoidance, Power Distance, Individualism Vs Collectivism, Future Orientation
and Gender Differentiation. For example, a country like Sweden, which is ranked
high on uncertainty avoidance, would prefer a structured and orderly work
environment.
On the other hand, a country like Russia, which is ranked low on the same
attribute would thrive under uncertainty. If a company from Sweden,
characterized by orderliness merges with a company from Russia characterized by
uncertainty, it can lead to chaos and confusion. Therefore, a complete
feasibility study on the human resources front is important while going for a
merger or acquisition.
Develop the ‘HR’ Project Plan
A project plan is a critical document that directs and supports the whole
process of integration and should be continuously updated to include the latest
developments. The project plan should define the tasks to be performed in order
of their priority. The owner for each task has to be identified and the
responsibilities assigned. It is also important to note that the owner enjoys
the authority to carry out the task successfully. Each task has to be given a
due date of completion and the owner should keep track of the developments and
record them. There should be common forum for exchange of information among the
different task owners. In all probability, these tasks would be interrelated
and the success of the project depends on effective coordination among all the
task owners. Project plan is designed for any merger or acquisition. But, how
many HR departments take the pains of designing a project plan exclusively for
the HR activities planning.
The project plan should also take into consideration some unavoidable hurdles
that may arise and provide for contingencies. It is also important to note that
the support of other departments like the Finance and the Legal departments is
essential for the successful implementation of the integration plan. Therefore,
the inputs from these departments should be taken into consideration while
working on the plan.
Next Page
Conducting
the HR due Diligence Review
|