Wikipedia's Growth Story
|
|
ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection
Case Details:
Case Code : BSTR272
Case Length : 13 pages
Period : 2001-07
Pub Date : 2008
Teaching Note :Not Available
Organization : Wikipedia
Themes: Business Models
|
Growth Factors and
Challenges
Industry : Internet and e-Commerce
Countries : US
To download Wikipedia's Growth Story case study
(Case Code: BSTR272) click on the button below, and select the case from the list of available cases:
OR
Buy With PayPal
|
Price:
For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 300;
For delivery through courier (within India): Rs. 300 + Shipping & Handling Charges extra
» Business Strategy Case Studies
» Case Studies Collection
» Business Strategy Short Case Studies
» View Detailed Pricing Info
» How To Order This Case
» Business Case Studies
» Area Specific Case Studies
» Industry Wise Case Studies
» Company Wise Case Studies
Please note:
This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
Chat with us
Please leave your feedback
|
|
<< Previous
Excerpts
History and Growth of Wikipedia
|
Wikipedia traces its origins to its predecessor Nupedia,
founded by Jimmy Wales (Wales). Nupedia was also an open content, peer review
encyclopedia to which highly qualified people contributed. Larry Sanger (Sanger)
functioned as its editor-in-chief.
Sanger took up the responsibility of recruiting people for Nupedia.
He hired an
assistant who worked solely to recruit people for Nupedia and, later, for
Wikipedia. Along with Wales, he gave many interviews which helped in marketing
the new project...
|
|
The Success Mantras
In 2007, around 75% of the articles in Wikipedia were on the non-English sites
of Wikipedia. This had steadily increased from 10% in January 2002, and about
50% in January 2004. Since the beginning, Wikipedia strove to be an
international project...
|
|
The Criticisms
The most common criticism against Wikipedia was that the credentials of
the author of the article or its editor were not displayed on the
website.
Some articles which were written by people knowledgeable in the
field were excellent, containing useful and relevant information, while
others were very amateurish, unauthoritative, and even downright wrong.
Hence, it was very difficult to determine the credibility of the
articles, especially for those who were new to the topic that they were
researching on Wikipedia... |
The Future of Wikipedia?
In light of the criticisms relating to the quality of
content, Wikipedia did take some corrective measures. One such step was that
users had to register themselves on the site to be able to write a new article.
However, many users felt that this policy was a departure from Wikipedia's
ideology that anyone could contribute content to the site. For extreme
vandalism, there was arbitration and mediation machinery in place...
Exhibits
|
