Genetic Engineering: Questions of Ethics and Effectiveness
|
|
ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection
Case Details:
Case Code : BECG079
Case Length : 17 Pages
Period : 1990-2007
Pub Date : 2007
Teaching Note :Not Available Organization : -
Industry : Agri-products
Countries : Worldwide
To download Genetic Engineering: Questions of Ethics and Effectiveness case study
(Case Code: BECG079) click on the button below, and select the case from the list of available cases:
OR
Buy With PayPal
|
Price:
For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 300;
For delivery through Shipping & Handling Charges extra: Rs. 300 +Shipping & Handling Charges extra
»
Business Ethics Case Studies
» Case Studies Collection
» ICMR Home
» Short Case Studies » View Detailed Pricing Info » How To Order This Case » Business Case Studies
» Case Studies by Area
» Case Studies by Industry
» Case Studies by Company
Please note:
This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
Chat with us
Please leave your feedback
|
<< Previous
Excerpts Contd...
Cost of GM Seed Technology
Seed companies have been criticized for charging exorbitantly high royalties for the use of GM products. Farmers were also required to sign a
'technology use agreement' at the time of purchase of GM seeds that prohibited them from saving any GM seeds from farming for replanting...
GE: Still Facing Opposition
Unlike in the US and Asia, where the acreage under GM crops was increasing
rapidly, the pace was much slower in the EU. As of 2006, only a few countries in
the EU produced GM crops. In Spain, GM maize was produced in only around 60,000
hectares of land.
In Portugal, Germany, France and the Czech Republic, GM crops were grown on a
much smaller scale than in the US. Moreover, EU legislation too was not as
supportive of GM foods as that of the US. The EU had rules to avoid uncontrolled
mixing of GM and conventional maize. It also required manufacturers to label
food and feed made from GM maize.
|
|
Even as of 2007, Europeans in general held strong
reservations about GM foods and were less willing than Americans to accept GM
foods as part of their diet.
|
The fact that only a small fraction of the GM maize grown in the EU was
directly used for producing food such as cornflakes, popcorn, canned
sweet corn, or corn oil, indicated the acceptance levels for GM foods in
Europe.
In mid-2007, the EU planned to lift the ban on commercial growing of GM
crops. Farmers were expected to be allowed to grow GM potatoes and some
other varieties of GM maize. However, the potatoes were to be used
solely for industrial purposes such as making paper. Meanwhile in the
US, as the GM varieties of soy, maize and cotton became widely accepted,
the proportion of GM plants in total agricultural production increased
(Refer Exhibit VII for cultivation of GM plants in US in 2007)... |
Exhibits
Exhibit I: Area under GM Crops in Various Countries in 2005
and 2006
Exhibit II: A Brief Note on GM and GM Foods
Exhibit III: A List of Approved GM Crops and their Advantages
Exhibit IV: An Action Plan for Avoiding GM Foods
Exhibit V: Some Examples of Genetic Contamination in Different Countries
Exhibit VI: The Mutant Rice: What Can Go Wrong with GE
Exhibit VII: Cultivation of GM Plants in US in 2007
|
|