Empowerment
Participation
The Process of Participation
Advantages of Participation
Essential Prerequisites for Successful Participation
Programs for Participation
Consultative Management
Suggestion Programs
Programs
Emphasizing Quality
Middle-Management Committees
Industrial Democracy
Self-Managing Teams
Limitations of Participation
The term empowerment means giving employees power and authority to make
decisions on their own. When people are allowed to work with minimal
interference from their superiors and are given the authority and
responsibility to make decisions, they are said to be empowered. Employees
can be empowered by ensuring their participation in decision-making.
Participation is defined as the mental and emotional involvement of people in
the activities of the group, which encourages them take responsibility for
and contribute to the achievement of group goals.
Participation proves advantageous for the organization in many ways. It
improves the quality and quantity of output. It also improves the motivation
levels of employees, decreases the rate of attrition and absenteeism, and
improves communication within the organization. Other lesser tangible
benefits are decreases in the number of conflicts, lower stress levels,
greater commitment to goals, and lower resistance to change.
Certain prerequisites are essential for participation; for instance, adequate
time should be allowed for participation, and the potential benefits of
participation should be greater than the costs involved. For participating
effectively, the employees must also have the relevant abilities and skills,
and should be interested in that particular area of work. The participants
should be able to exchange their ideas effectively with each other and they
should not perceive the process as a threat to their position or status. The
degree of participation also depends on the area of job freedom for that
particular department.
There are many programs that can be used to encourage participation of
employees. Some programs involve employees only to a modest extent, while
other programs require a substantial amount of participation from employees.
The most common participation programs are consultative management,
suggestion programs, quality circles and TQM, middle-management committees,
industrial democracy and self-managing teams. One or more of such programs
can be used within the same organization.
Consultative management refers to the practice of managers obtaining feedback
and contributions from employees on certain issues for making decisions.
Suggestion programs are formal plans developed by the organization which
invite the employees to give suggestions for work improvements. Quality
circles are voluntary groups, comprising employees who are trained in
statistical techniques and problem-solving skills. They attempt to generate
ideas to improve the working conditions and productivity of the organization.
The TQM approach is an ongoing effort to involve all employees of an
organization in the search for novel ways to improve its operations. This
approach involves training employees in statistical methods and giving them
the opportunity to develop extensive problem-solving and group
decision-making skills. Middle-management committees provide junior directors
the opportunity to understand a particular problem and recommend solutions
for it. The board of junior directors carefully studies and analyzes the
problem and presents its recommendations to the top management.
Industrial democracy is a participation program in which workers'
participation at various levels is made mandatory by the government,
especially for those decisions that affect the workers. Self-managing teams
undertake extensive group discussions and use the ideas and influence of the
group for making decisions.
Participation has a few limitations. Due to the complex technology and
organizational structure of today's work setup, some people may find it
difficult to participate in different and varied organizational issues.
Problems may also crop up when employees make suggestions in areas where they
are not really competent.
Employees may expect consultation on every issue, whether they have the
relevant expertise or not, and when they are not consulted, they may feel
resentful. Some superiors too may face difficulties in relating to their
subordinates as they may feel that their traditional authority is threatened.
They may be uncomfortable in their roles as coaches and facilitators. Another
serious drawback of participation is that it could be used to manipulate
employees.
Next Chapter
»