Itanium 2 processor, microprocessors, high-end enterprise, business intelligence, databases, enterprise resource planning, SCM, computing, computer-aided engineering
At the end of 2002, Sun announced it would not support chips from Intel with the release of its Solaris 9 operating system this year. Sun also did not offer Solaris support for Itanium 2. Although Sun is once working on a version of Solaris that would run on Itanium, those efforts have ended. Both companies'pointed fingers at each other for stopping the effort. Intel, meanwhile, has little chance of getting its Itanium 2 chips embedded with Solaris as Sun did give a port to Solaris with Itanium 2.
|
|
But Dell believes that AMD has to prove that Opteron performed and that it could make it consistently in volume. Though AMD is more popular with consumers rather than businesses, Dell believed that AMD could move into the business server segment at a future date.
Intel maintained that Itanium 2, unlike Opteron, is designed for the next 20 years. To generate demand, Intel is building what it called an "ecosystem" around the chip. In early 2003, IBM announced it would be sharing technology and manufacturing know-how with AMD creating the distinct possibility of AMD's Opteron and Athlon 64 chips being manufactured in IBM's plants. That could help IBM and make it harder for Intel to convince customers to give their existing software and move on to Itanium. If IBM helped Opteron, it could also force Intel's hand and create an awkward choice for HP. Intel is widely believed to have a contingency plan in place: A 64-bit chip, reportedly called Yamhill, which featured the same Pentium compatibility as AMD's Opteron. If Opteron took off, it is expected to be only a matter of time before Intel launched Yamhill. And the better Yamhill did, the less software writers would feel the need to write programs that run on Itanium.
8] Source: See This Chip? Fortune, February 3, 2003.