Authors: Ravi Madapati,
Faculty Member
ICMR (IBS Center for Management Research).
High cost |
|
Users with the technical expertise can not fix problems that are technically easy to fix, but have to wait until Microsoft published a patch. The availability of source code in case of Linux is particularly useful for programmers and computer science students, who form a significant percentage of Linux users.
Crash-prone
The quality of Windows is another issue. Steve Ballmer (Ballmer)3,CEO of Microsoft has once admitted that in the rush to beat Netscape, Microsoft had cut corners in quality control. There have been reports about Windows
"crashing" for no particularly good reason, often causing people to lose files. Even Windows 95 and Windows NT which are far more stable than the earlier version Windows 3.1x, have failed with alarming regularity. On the other hand there are documented cases of Linux servers running non-stop for over a year without a system-halting crash.
Monopolistic attitude
Epitomized by the antitrust proceedings launched by the Department of Justice there is a general perception that Microsoft wants to rule the world. Whether true or not, many people have been seeking alternatives to Microsoft systems just because they are uncomfortable with the idea of a Microsoft monopoly.
Since 2000, Linux has increased its market share in corporate applications. It runs on nearly 10% of all servers and is growing at about 23% a year4.Roughly 30% of chief technologists are considering moving to Linux5. Peripheral makers from HP in printers to Epson in scanners have made sure that they have Linux-compatible offerings. Sun has spent millions of dollars on its Star Office software suite that give Linux users programs that work like and are compatible with PowerPoint, Word and Excel.
3] Source: http://www.seul.org/docs/whylinux.html
4] Fortune, January 21, 2003 in Lindows: Brining Linux To The Masses
5] According to market researcher Gartner Inc.