<<PREVIOUS
THE CHANGE LEADER
BACKGROUND NOTE
CHANGE CHALLENGES - PART I
CHANGE CHALLENGES - PART II
ICICI had to face change resistance once again in December 2000, when ICICI
Bank was merged with Bank of Madura (BoM)[1] . Though ICICI Bank was nearly
three times the size of BoM, its staff strength was only 1,400 as against BoM's
2,500. Half of BoM's personnel were clerks and around 350 were subordinate
staff.
There
were large differences in profiles, grades, designations and salaries of
personnel in the two entities. It was also reported that there was uneasiness
among the staff of BoM as they felt that ICICI would push up the productivity
per employee, to match the levels of ICICI [2]. BoM employees feared that their
positions would come in for a closer scrutiny. They were not sure whether the
rural branches would continue or not as ICICI's business was largely
urban-oriented.
The apprehensions of the BoM employees seemed to be
justified as the working culture at ICICI and BoM were quite different and
the emphasis of the respective management was also different. While BoM
management concentrated on the overall profitability of the Bank, ICICI
management turned all its departments into individual profit centers and
bonus for employees was given on the performance of individual profit
center rather than profits of whole organization.
ICICI not only put in place a host of measures to technologically upgrade
the BoM branches to ICICI's standards, but also paid special attention to
facilitate a smooth cultural integration. The company appointed
consultants Hewitt Associates[3]to help in working out a uniform
compensation and work culture and to take care of any change management
problems. |
|
ICICI conducted an employee behavioral pattern study to
assess the various fears and apprehensions that employees typically went through
during a merger. (Refer Table I).
TABLE I
'POST-MERGER' EMPLOYEE BEHAVIORAL PATTERN
PERIOD |
EMPLOYEE BEHAVIOR |
Day 1 |
Denial, fear, no improvement
|
After a month |
Sadness, slight improvement
|
After a Year |
Acceptance, significant improvement
|
After 2 Years |
Relief, liking, enjoyment, business development
activities
|
Source:www.sibm.edu
Based on the above findings, ICICI established systems to
take care of the employee resistance with action rather than words. The 'fear of
the unknown' was tackled with adept communication and the 'fear of inability to
function' was addressed by adequate training. The company also formulated a 'HR
blue print' to ensure smooth integration of the human resources. (Refer Table
II).
TABLE II
MANAGING HR DURING THE ICICI-BoM MERGER
THE HR BLUEPRINT |
AREAS OF HR INTEGRATION
FOCUSSED ON |
-
A data base of the entire HR
structure
-
Road map of career
-
Determining the blue print of
HR moves
-
Communication of milestones
-
IT Integration - People
Integration - Business Integration.
|
- Employee communication
- Cultural integration
- Organization structuring
- Recruitment & Compensation
- Performance management
- Training
- Employee
relations
|
Source:www.sibm.edu
To ensure employee participation and to decrease the resistance to the
change, management established clear communication channels throughout to avoid
any kind of wrong messages being sent across. Training programmes were conducted
which emphasized on knowledge, skill, attitude and technology to upgrade skills
of the employees. Management also worked on contingency plans and initiated
direct dialogue with the employee unions of the BoM to maintain good employee
relations.
By June 2001, the process of integration between ICICI and BoM was started. ICICI transferred around 450 BoM
employees to ICICI Bank, while 300 ICICI employees were shifted to BoM branches.
Promotion schemes for BoM employees were initiated and around 800 BoM officers
were found to be eligible for the promotions. By the end of the year, ICICI
seemed to have successfully handled the HRaspects of the BoM merger. According
to a news report[4] , "The win-win situation created by….HR initiatives have
resulted in high level of morale among all sections of the employees from the
erstwhile BoM."
Even as the changes following the ICICI-BoM merger were
stabilizing, ICICI announced its merger with ICICI Bank in October 2001. The
merger, to be effective from March 2002, was expected to unleash yet another
series of changes at the organization. With Kamath still heading ICICI, analysts
were hopeful that the bank would come out successfully in the task of
integrating the operations of both the entities this time as well.
QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION:
-
'The changed focus of ICICI to become
a one-stop shop for financial services necessitated the changes in the
organization culture and goals.' Analyze the changes implemented by Kamath in
mid-1990s and comment briefly on the necessity and efficacy of these changes.
-
Compare and contrast the change
management process at ICICI initiated after Kamath became the CEO with the one
following the ICICI-BoM merger. Also explain the rationale behind the employee
resistance in both the cases.
EXHIBIT I :ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF ICICI (2001)
EXHIBIT II: EMPLOYEE STRENGTH OVER THE YEARS
YEAR |
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES |
1993 |
1117 |
1994 |
1237 |
1995 |
1237 |
1996 |
1239 |
2001 |
8275 |
Source: ICICI Annual reports
EXHIBIT III:ICICI PROFITABILTY
OVER THE YEARS
YEAR
|
PAT
|
1994-95
|
3.1
|
1995-96
|
3.9
|
1996-97
|
4.36
|
1997-98
|
7.52
|
1998-99
|
10.86
|
1999-00
|
10.01
|
2000-01
|
12.06
|
Source: ICICI Annual Reports
ADDITIONAL READINGS & REFERENCES:
1. Hema B., Rebuilding ICICI, Business India, May 20,
1996.
2. Sriram N., Reinventing ICICI, Business World, May 29, 1996.
3. Shedding Fat, Business Standard, September 1, 1998.
4. George Cherian, ICICI Revamps Set-Up, The Economic Times, March 21, 1999.
5. Smith Alexander George, ICICI Bank begins integration of BoM, www.rediff.com,
June 13, 2001.
6. Jayakar Roshni & Arora Sunit, ICICI: The Melting Pot, www.bestemployers.com.
7. www.icici.com.
8. www.indiainfoline.com.
[1] Bank of Madura was
established in 1943 at Madurai, Tamil Nadu. By 2000, it was number one bank in
Tamil Nadu and it had 278 branches all over India.
[2] In 1999-2000 business per employee at
ICICI averaged Rs. 59.5 million to BoM's Rs 22 million and profit per employee
was Rs 0.78 million to BoM's Rs 0.17 million.
[3] Hewitt Associates is a global management
consulting and outsourcing firm specializing in human resource solutions.
[4] 'Bank of Madura & ICICI Bank merger
proceeds smoothly,' www.rediff.com, September 27, 2001.
|