Governance Problems at Royal Dutch/Shell
|
|
ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection
To download Governance Problems at Royal Dutch Shell case study
(Case Code: BSTR155) click on the button below, and select the case from the list of available cases:
OR
Buy With PayPal
|
OR
» Business Strategy Case Studies » Case Studies Collection » Business Strategy Short Case Studies
» View Detailed Pricing Info » How To Order This Case
» Business Case Studies
» Case Studies by Area
» Case Studies by Industry
» Case Studies by Company
Please note:
This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
Chat with us
Please leave your feedback
|
Case Details: |
Price: |
Case Code |
: |
BSTR155 |
Electronic Format: Rs.
500; Courier (within India):Rs. 25 Extra
ThemesCorporate Governance |
Case Length |
: |
17 Pages |
Period |
: |
2000 - 2005 |
Organization |
: |
Royal Dutch | Shell |
Pub Date |
: |
2005 |
Teaching Note |
: |
Not Available |
Countries
|
: |
UK,
Netherlands |
Industry |
: |
Petroleum and Petrochemicals
|
Abstract:
In January 2004, Royal Dutch/Shell (Shell), the third largest oil exploration
and production company in the world, announced that its financial statements had
shown inflated oil reserves in the earlier years, and that it would downgrade
nearly four billion barrels of its 'proven'oil and gas reserves.
This announcement created a furor among the investors and industry analysts who
blamed the complex and opaque twin-board governance structure for the company's
problems. Experts believed that this structure lacked accountability and
facilitated financial manipulations. The case study examines in detail the twin
board governance structure of Shell and the loopholes in such structure.
|
|
In order to restore investor confidence, Shell announced a merger of the Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies under a single parent company in October 2004. The case highlights the key proposals and examines the pros and cons of this merger plan.
Issues:
» Conduct an in-depth study on the twin-board governance structure of Royal
Dutch/Shell
» Examine how the twin-board governance structure of Shell resulted in lower
accountability and transparency
» Study the circumstances that necessitated organizational restructuring at
Shell
» Examine the solution of merging Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies under a
single parent company
Contents:
Keywords:
Royal Dutch/Shell Oil Reserves Controversy Corporate Governance Management Structure Twin-Board Structure Three-Way Matrix Structure Organizational Restructuring Accountability Management Control Merger Proposal, Governance Structure, Oil, Structure Shell Loopholes, Oil Reserves, Shells Stock Price, Marcus Samuel, Assets Operations Netherlands-Based, Joint Venture, Twin-Board, Merger Proposal
Governance Problems at Royal Dutch Shell
- Next Page>>
|
|