Destination Marketing: Tourism Australia's Controversial Campaign
	
 
		
			 | 
			
	  | 
			
 
ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection
  
Case Details:
  
Case Code : MKTG197 
Case Length : 21 pages 
Period : 2006-2008 
Pub Date : 2008 
Teaching Note : Available 
Organization : Tourism Australia 
Industry : Tourism 
Countries : Australia/ Global 
 
To download Destination Marketing: Tourism Australia's Controversial Campaign case study 
(Case Code: MKTG197) click on the button  below, and select the case from the list of available cases:
  
 
 
  
Price: For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 400; 
For delivery through courier (within India): Rs. 400 + Shipping & Handling Charges extra 
 
 
 » Marketing Case Studies 
» Marketing Management Short Case Studies 
 » View Detailed Pricing Info  » How To Order This Case 
» Business Case Studies 
» Case Studies by Area 
» Case Studies by Industry 
» Case Studies by Company
  
  
 
 
 
Please note:
  
This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
  
  
Chat with us
  
  
 
Please leave your feedback
  
 
  | 
		
		
| 
 
	 
	
	 
	
	 
	
	 
  
<< Previous 
			Excerpts Contd...
			Controversy and Criticisms
	
		| 
 The 'Bloody Hell' campaign attracted controversy immediately 
after its launch. The campaign was criticized in some of the target countries 
for using swear words like 'Bloody' and 'Hell' and for its allegedly crude 
content. 
 
The advertisement campaign was released in the UK, Australia's most valuable 
market, in March 2006. (Refer to Exhibit VI for the top 10 source countries for 
short-term visitor arrivals into Australia) The advertisement was banned in UK 
for using the word 'bloody' and, UK's Broadcast Advertising Clearance Center (BACC) 
instructed Tourism Australia authorities to drop the word 'Bloody' from the 
ad... 
		 | 
		
		   
		
		 | 
	 
 
The Results of the Campaign
Many critics described the campaign as a failure right from 
the first year of its launch. In the first year of its launch the number of 
tourist arrivals actually fell. In October 2006, the number of UK tourists who 
visited Australia fell by 2.3 percent compared to the preceding year. The number 
of Japanese tourists fell by 5.7 percent while the number of German tourists 
dropped by 4.7 percent... 
	
		| 
 | 
		
Outlook
		
		Some experts felt that the failure of the 'Bloody Hell' campaign had 
		dented the image of Tourism Australia as its predecessor, ATC, was 
		considered an expert in destination branding. Analysts said that apart 
		from the loss in tourist numbers and revenues, the controversy might 
		tarnish the image of brand 'Australia' itself. They said that Australia 
		should take urgent steps to control the damage caused by the failed 
		advertising campaign and design a new campaign to stop the decline in 
		tourist numbers, more so in view of the emergence of new tourist hot 
		spots like India and Malaysia...  | 
	 
 
Exhibits
Exhibit I: A Brief Note on Australia 
Exhibit II: A Brief Note on Destination Branding 
Exhibit III: History of Australian Tourism: A Timeline 
Exhibit IV: Logo of Tourism Australia 
Exhibit V: Some Scenes from the 'So Where the Bloody Hell are You?' Campaign 
Exhibit VI: The Top 10 Source Countries for Short-term Visitor Arrivals as of 
February 2008 
 
 | 
			
				  |