Themes: Financial Markets
Period : 1997 - 2002
Organization : SEBI
Pub Date : 2002
Countries : India
Industry : Financial Services
Analysts felt that the buyback option may be misused by MNCs to increase their equity stakes in their Indian ventures, escape public scrutiny and accountability and prevent them from the Indian regulatory environment. Moreover, the option to convert their Indian ventures into wholly owned subsidiaries and delist their shares from the stock markets provided MNCs with complete control over their Indian ventures, allowed them to repatriate profits and make more independent investment decisions. |
|
Reportedly, investors feared losing an exit option in case the shares get delisted. Moreover, during the second offer, the trading volume of shares fell to less than (on an average) 500 shares per day since December 2001.
Table II
Share Holding Pattern in Philips India Limited
Share Holding Pattern as on (%) |
30/06/2002 |
31/03/2002 |
31/12/2001 |
Foreign Promoters |
92.34 |
91.47 |
82.86 |
Institutional Investors |
0.07 |
0.07 |
0.85 |
Private Bodies |
0.14 |
0.18 |
1.49 |
General Public |
7.4 |
8.22 |
14.67 |
Source: www.indiainfoline.com
Similarly, when Cadbury made a buyback offer, public shareholding fell from 26.67% to just 7.32% within six months after the majority shareholders surrendered their shares (Refer Table III).