Themes: Financial Markets
Period : 1997 - 2002
Organization : SEBI
Pub Date : 2002
Countries : India
Industry : Financial Services
Moreover, in this case, investors felt that the premium offered by Cadbury Schweppes, the UK based parent company of Cadbury, was low. The offer was priced at Rs 500, which represented a premium of 24% on the average high and low prices over the past 26 weeks prior to the offer. However, Cadbury's stock had been trading at prices in excess of Rs 500 in 1999 and 2000 (Refer Table IV), with an average P/E multiple of 60 in 1999 and 54 in March 2000. Moreover, Cadbury's third quarter (October to December 2001) sales had increased by 11.2% compared to the same period in 2000, while its profits had increased by 5.2%. Hence, investors felt that the price offered for the buyback had not taken into consideration the future potential profits of the company and was not attractive to shareholders who had been holding their shares for a longer term. |
|
Table III
Share Holding Pattern in Cadbury India Limited
Share Holding Pattern as on (%) |
30/06/2002 |
31/03/2002 |
31/12/2001 |
Foreign Promoters |
90.25 |
51.00 |
51.00 |
Institutional Investors |
0.10 |
0.22 |
20.36 |
Private Bodies |
2.25 |
33.18 |
1.71 |
General Public |
7.32 |
15.46 |
26.67 |
Source: www.indiainfoline.com
In many cases, minority shareholders had expressed their opposition to the use of discriminatory pricing by MNCs for buying back shares. For example, Otis Elevators bought back 23.9% of the equity stake from the Mahindra group at Rs.375 per share in October 1999, but made a buyback open offer for only Rs. 280 for the remaining 31% of the shares held by the Indian public in May 2001.