The Johnson & Johnson Tylenol Controversies




Case Details Case Introduction 1 Case Introduction 2 Case Excerpts

<< Previous

Background Note

Inspired by the discoveries5 of Sir Joseph Lister (Lister)6, Robert Wood Johnson (Robert) and his two brothers7 formed a partnership firm to nurture the idea of a practical application of Lister's discoveries.Robert planned to enter the surgical dressings industry with a new type of readymade, sterile, wrapped and sealed surgical dressing in individual packages and suitable for instant use without the risk of contamination. In 1887, the trio converted the partnership into a company and the company was incorporated as Johnson & Johnson. Over the years, J&J established itself as a leading player in the healthcare industry.

The company introduced revolutionary surgical dressings, acquired established companies8, and expanded internationally. In 1956, Tylenol became a part of J&J, when the company acquired McNeil Laboratories9. Tylenol was sold as an over-the-counter (OTC)10 drug.During the 1960s, J&J aggressively promoted Tylenol among doctors and pharmacists as an alternative pain reliever. Soon, the product became very popular among consumers, as it was less irritating to the stomach as compared to other OTC analgesics11 like Aspirin or Ibuprofen (See Exhibit I). In 1974, J&J acquired StimTech, a healthcare company selling a unique product - Transcutaneous Electronic Nerve Stimulator (TENS).

Business Ethics Case Studies | Case Study in Management, Operations, Strategies, Business Ethics, Case Studies
or
Business Ethics Case Studies | Case Study in Management, Operations, Strategies, Business Ethics, Case Studies
or
PayPal (7 USD)

The product reduced pain by electronic means and was claimed to be effective against headaches, backaches and arthritis. Industry observers expected TENS to become a substitute for analgesics including Tylenol. However, while J&J's marketing made Tylenol the leader of the US analgesics market, TENS failed. StimTech's founders filed a suit against J&J saying that the latter bought the company to suppress TENS' growth as it was seen as a potential competitor to Tylenol. StimTech's founders won the suit and J&J had to pay them US$170 million. In early 1975, Tylenol faced heavy competition from a similar low-priced product called Datril, manufactured by Bristol-Myers...

Excerpts>>

 

top