PepsiCo’s Product Communication: Is It Ethical?
Details
CLMM103
4
2012
NO
200
PepsiCo, Inc.
Food & Beverage
US
Ethics in Marketing,Advertising & Promotion
Abstract
In March 2012, PepsiCo, the America-based Food and Beverages company, quietly removed the ‘SnackSmart’ labels from its food products and changed its cooking medium back to low cost palmolein from rice bran oil. Health activists opposed this move, which raised health concerns among consumers. The case also shows how the company promoted its products and why it changed the product ingredients. It raised ethical concerns about product communication and the promotion of the product.
Learning Objectives
The case is structured to achieve the following Learning Objectives:
- Discuss how PepsiCo promoted its snack products to increase market share.
- Understand and discuss the ethical issues in product communication.
Keywords
PepsiCo, Frito-lay, Cost, Ethics, Product communication, Label, Snacks, Healthy, Food and Beverage, Market Share, Promotion, Advertisement, Ethical advertisement, Strategy
Related Case Studies
| Case Title | Details | Price | Add to Cart |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Case Title Red Bull and Pepsi`s Spat Over a TaglineCase Code: CLMM168 |
Details | 300 | Add to Cart |
|
Case Title SpiceJet’s ‘Color the Skies’ CampaignCase Code: MKTG339 |
Details | 500 | Add to Cart |
|
Case Title Cape Town Tourism: Employing Digital Marketing in TourismCase Code: MKTG338 |
Details | 600 | Add to Cart |
|
Case Title Newcastle Brown Ale’s Creative Super Bowl Campaign: A Novel Crowdfunding StrategyCase Code: MKTG337 |
Details | 600 | Add to Cart |
|
Case Title Maker’s Mark and the Ethics of AdvertisingCase Code: MKTG335 |
Details | 400 | Add to Cart |