The Acquisition Bid for UFJ Holdings
|
|
ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection
Case Details:
Case Code : BSTR133
Case Length : 17 Pages
Period : 2000 - 2004
Organization : Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, UFJ Holdings
Pub Date : 2004
Teaching Note :Not Available Countries : Japan
Industry : Banking
To download The Acquisition Bid for UFJ Holdings case study (Case Code: BSTR133) click on the button below, and select the case from the list of available cases:
Price:
For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 500;
For delivery through courier (within India): Rs. 500 + Shipping & Handling Charges extra
» Business Strategy Case Studies
» Business Strategy Short Case Studies
» View Detailed Pricing Info
» How To Order This Case » Business Case Studies
» Case Studies by Area
» Case Studies by Industry
» Case Studies by Company
Please note:
This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
Chat with us
Please leave your feedback
|
<< Previous
EXCERPTS Contd...
The Synergies
Analysts commented that the UFJ-MTFG merger would create an entity with combined assets worth ¥188 tn, ¥4 tn more as compared to the proposed UFJ-SMFG merger. The synergies and cost reduction resulting from the merger were expected to boost the earnings of the combined entity by 20 per cent.
After the merger, MTFG would have access to UFJ's extensive branch network, individual customer base and its top corporate clients like Toyota. UFJ's core area of operations comprised retail business and small and enterprises, which MTFG lacked. Though MTFG had a stronger presence in corporate lending, the revenues from this business were stagnating and net interest margins were less. Moreover, after the merger, MTFG would emerge as the leader in the mortgage business, in which it lagged behind Mizuho and SMFG. Analysts also pointed out that both the entities would benefit from the complementary nature of their branch network and operations. Most of MTFG's branches were in and around Tokyo, Eastern Japan, whereas UFJ had a strong presence in Western Japan in the regions of Osaka and Nagoya...
|
|
The Pitfalls
Notwithstanding the benefits, analysts were quick to point out possible disadvantages. They commented that both UFJ and MTFG were formed after a series of complicated and long drawn out mergers, which meant that each group already had conflicting corporate cultures.
The formation of UFJ faced a lot of personnel problems and cultural conflicts. Industry observers felt UFJ's union with MTFG would involve a lot of risk due to the diversity in core areas of operations. The merger could backfire if both of them failed to settle restructuring problems like pay roll cuts, branch closures, personnel and organizational shuffling and linking computer systems. In spite of UFJ's strong retail clientele and economies of scale after the merger, analysts expressed doubts about the profitability of the merged entity. UFJ's significant non-performing loans was expected to affect MTFG's balance sheet. Most banks in Japan were burdened by huge quantum of bad loans, and the Japanese government had to bail them out by injecting public funds...
|
|
Exhibits
Exhibit I: The Japanese Banking Industry
Exhibit II: Top Ten Banks in the World (July 2004)
Exhibit III: Consolidated Balance Sheets of UFJ
Exhibit IV: Consolidated Balance Sheets of SMFG (2003)
Exhibit V: Consolidated Balance Sheets of MTFG (2003)
Exhibit VI: SMFG Proposal for Integration
Exhibit VII: Takeover Regulations of Listed Companies in Japan
|
|