British Steel - Dutch Royal Hoogovens Merger: An Anglo-Dutch Marriage not Working Out?
|
|
ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection
Case Details:
Case Code : BSTR144
Case Length : 20 Pages
Period : 1999-2004
Organization : British Steel
Pub Date : 2005
Teaching Note : Available
Countries : UK, Netherlands
Industry : Steel
To download British Steel - Dutch Royal Hoogovens Merger: An Anglo-Dutch Marriage not Working Out? case study (Case Code: BSTR144) click on the button below, and select the case from the list of available cases:
Price:
For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 500;
For delivery through courier (within India): Rs. 500 + Shipping & Handling Charges extra
» Business Strategy Case Studies
» Business Strategy Short Case Studies
» View Detailed Pricing Info
» How To Order This Case » Business Case Studies
» Case Studies by Area
» Case Studies by Industry
» Case Studies by Company
Please note:
This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
Chat with us
Please leave your feedback
|
<< Previous
EXCERPTS Contd...
Problems Galore
In 2000, Corus's UK operations lost £350 million and the share prices dropped to stand at half the value that prevailed during the time of the merger. This led to the resignation of the joint Chief Executives, John Bryant and Fokko Van Duyne in late 2000, who were replaced by Sir Bryan Moffat (Moffat).
In 2003, just around three years after the completion of the merger, the severity of the company's problems seemed surprising, especially given the fact that the global steel prices had been on the path of recovery during the past year. The company's rationalization of R&D efforts failed to bring about the desired results.
Restructuring of the UK R&D facilities and closure of a number of steel producing units resulted in large scale labour unrest. This affected productivity and the UK arm of the merged entity continued to show poor results. The cultural mismatch between the two subsidiaries was also a cause of concern for the management...
|
|
What Analysts Had To Say
Though there were conflicting views on the synergies achieved from the merger, one view that analysts generally agreed upon was that if the environment had been more hospitable then there might have been a more gentle coalescence between the two sides.
But the downward spiraling steel prices, the increasing value of the pound, declining demand and the resulting losses, which led to large scale restructuring and downsizing pushed the pace of change faster than the combined entity could absorb. Analysts tracking international mergers and acquisitions pointed out that the disappointing performance of Corus in the post merger period was not untypical of other merged firms. Looking at several previous experiences of mergers, one found that profitability usually failed to live upto the expectations of the management at the time of the merger. But in this case, it was widely believed that better HR management at the time of the merger could have improved the outcome for Corus...
|
|
Exhibits
Exhibit I: Global Steel Supply-Demand
Exhibit II: World Steel Prices: Declining Trend
Exhibit III: The US Steel Industry
Exhibit IV: Status of the Two Companies Prior to the Merger
Exhibit V: Sales Offices and Market Segment
Exhibit VI: Organization Structure
Exhibit VII: Employee Distribution
Exhibit VIII: Corus Financial Performance
|
|