The Turnaround of Ispat Karmet
	
       			 | 
			 
	 | 
			
 
ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection
  
Case Details:
  
Case Code : BSTA005 
Case Length : 11 Pages 
Period : 1994 - 2004 
Pub Date : 2005 
Teaching Note :Not Available Organization : Karaganda Metallurgical Complex (Karmet)  
Industry : Steel 
Countries : Kazakhstan
  
To download The Turnaround of Ispat Karmet case study (Case Code: BSTA005) click on the button  below, and select the case from the list of available cases: 
  
 
 
  
 OR 
  
Buy With PayPal
 | 
 
 
Price:
  
For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 300; For delivery through courier (within India): Rs. 
300 + Rs. 25 for Shipping & Handling Charges 
  
 
» Business Strategy Case Studies 
» Case Studies Collection 
» Business Strategy Short Case Studies 
» View Detailed Pricing Info 
» How To Order This Case 
» Business Case Studies 
» Area Specific Case Studies 
» Industry Wise Case Studies 
» Company Wise Case Studies
 
 
Please note:
  
This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
  
  
Chat with us
  
  
 
Please leave your feedback
  
 
  | 
		
		
| 
 
	 
	
	 
	
	 
	
	 
  
<< Previous 
Introduction
	
		| 
 By 1996, L N Mittal (Mittal), chairman Ispat International, 
had come a long way from a wire rod manufacturer with a single plant in 
Indonesia in 1976 to being the owner of a steel company with a market 
capitalization of roughly $3 billion and net sales of $2.7 billion.  
 
This impressive growth, which had attracted media attention all over the world, 
had been driven by a series of acquisitions in Mexico, Canada, Trinidad, Germany 
and Ireland between 1992 and 1996. Most of these acquisitions followed a similar 
pattern. As governments around the world privatised their steel industries, 
Ispat bought underperforming mills at bargain prices, maximized production, and 
upgraded the product mix. 
		 | 
		 
		
         
 |  
 
A major reason behind Mittal's success had been his 
anticipation that the price of steel scrap, the main raw material for 
mini-mills, would rise as more mini-mills were constructed. He had therefore 
invested in a substitute for scrap known as direct-reduced iron (DRI), and was 
soon producing more of it than any one else. DRI cost about $95 a tonne in 1996, 
compared with $155 a tonne for the high-quality scrap that mini-mills mostly 
used, and $125 a tonne for the pig-iron used to make steel in blast furnaces.
 
 
Mittal had developed a tremendous reputation as a turnaround artist. His 
turnaround strategy revolved around cutting purchase costs, laying off workers 
and making necessary investments to eliminate production bottlenecks. In 
addition to the quality of technology and management, Ispat's geographical 
spread enabled Mittal, as soon as he acquired a firm, to redirect sales and 
purchasing internationally in order to strike the best deals. Analysts believed 
that Mittal had a remarkable eye for a bargain and had figured out the art of 
turning around rundown steel mills. Also, he was willing to walk away from a 
deal if the price was not right... 
Excerpts >> 
 
 
 
 | 
			 
				 |