Employee Downsizing
|
|
ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection
Case Details:
Case Code : HROB016
Case Length : 09 Pages
Period : 1990 - 2001
Pub Date : 2001
Teaching Note : Available
Organization : Varied
Industry : Varied
Countries : USA, India, etc...
To download Employee Downsizing case study
(Case Code: HROB016) click on the button below, and select the case from the list of available cases:
Price: For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 300; For delivery through courier (within India): Rs. 300 + Rs. 25 for Shipping & Handling Charges
» Human Resource and Organization Behavior Case Studies
» HRM Short Case Studies
» View Detailed Pricing Info
» How To Order This Case » Business Case Studies » Area Specific Case Studies
» Industry Wise Case Studies
» Company Wise Case Studies
Please note:
This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
Chat with us
Please leave your feedback
|
<< Previous
"Next to the death of a relative or friend, there's
nothing more traumatic than losing a job. Corporate cutbacks threaten the
security and self-esteem of survivors and victims alike. They cause turmoil and
shatter morale inside organizations and they confirm the view that profits
always come before people."
- Laura Rubach, Industry Analyst, in 1994.
"The market is going to determine where we stop with the
layoffs."
- Tom Ryan, a Boeing spokesman, in August 2002.
Downsizing Blues all over the World
The job markets across the world looked very gloomy in the early 21st century,
with many companies having downsized a considerable part of their employee base
and many more revealing plans to do so in the near future.
Companies on the Forbes 500 and Forbes International 800 lists had laid off over
460,000 employees' altogether, during early 2001 itself.
This trend created havoc in the lives of millions of employees across the world,
Many people lost their jobs at a very short or no advance notice, and many
others lived in a state of uncertainty regarding their jobs.
|
|
Companies claimed that worldwide economic slowdown during the late-1990s had
had forced them to downsize, cut costs, optimize resources and survive the
slump. Though the concept of downsizing had existed for a long time, its use
had increased only recently, since the late-1990s. (Refer Table I for
information on downsizing by major companies).
|
Analysts commented that downsizing did more damage
than good to the companies as it resulted in low morale of retained
employees, loss of employee loyalty and loss of expertise as key
personnel/experts left to find more secure jobs. Moreover, the
uncertain job environment created by downsizing negatively effected
the quality of the work produced. Analysts also felt that most
companies adopted downsizing just as a 'me-too' strategy even when
it was not required. However, despite these concerns, the number of
companies that chose to downsize their employee base increased in
the early 21st century. Downsizing strategy was adopted by almost
all major industries such as banking, automobiles, chemical,
information technology, fabrics, FMCG, air transportation and
petroleum. |
In mid-2002, some of the major companies that announced
downsizing plans involving a large number of employees included Jaguar (UK),
Boeing (US), Charles Schwab (US), Alactel (France), Dresdner (Germany), Lucent
Technologies (US), Ciena Corp. (US) and Goldman Sachs Group (US). Even in
companies' developing countries such as India, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia and
South Korea were going in for downsizing.
Employee Downsizing
- Next Page>>
|
|