![]() |
Marketing Maker’s Mark (B): Diluting the Brand?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ca28/0ca28d173215949c37e481c3d3e7e6176602a3d2" alt="Case Details"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bf25/8bf250d38edd58089fc93edc139bedd1a46985e6" alt="Case Introduction 1"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2792/c2792fc82b0f7332a8d67ca2bd37f2c2b3b2a60a" alt="Case Introduction 2"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23790/23790f2bb98ce40aaaaaa6a35783bb32e819a786" alt="Case Excerpts"
Abstract
Issues
The case is structured to achieve the following teaching objectives:
- Understand the marketing initiatives adopted by Maker’s Mark over the years and how the brand leveraged social media for marketing communication.
- Analyze the company’s decision to dilute the product, and its response to the consumer backlash that followed.
- Discuss and debate whether the decision of Maker’s Mark was a public relations fiasco or a clever marketing stunt.
- Discuss the implications for brands in this new age, which is marked by a proliferation of social media where consumer reactions can make or mar a brand.
Contents |
Introduction |
Background Note |
Past Marketing Initiatives |
Growing Demand And Product Shortage |
Decision To Dilute The Brand |
Reversing The Decision |
PR Fiasco Or Marking Stunt? |
The Road Ahead |
Exhibit |
Keywords
New Coke fiasco; Manage demand; Manage shortage; Marketing communication; PR fiasco; Clever PR stunt; Crisis communication; Digital marketing; Loyal customer base; Social media; Brand Management; Branding; Brand differentiators; Bourbon industry