Corporate Governance Concerns at Berkshire Hathaway
|
|
ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection
To download Corporate Governance Concerns at Berkshire Hathaway
case study
(Case Code: BECG123) click on the button below, and select the case from the list of available cases:
OR
Buy With PayPal
|
»Business Ethics Case Studies » Case Studies Collection
» ICMR Home
» Business Ethics Short Case Studies
» View Detailed Pricing Info » How To Order This Case » Business Case Studies
» Case Studies by Area
» Case Studies by Industry
» Case Studies by Company
Please note:
This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
Chat with us
Please leave your feedback
|
Case Details: |
Price: |
Case Code |
: |
BECG123 |
For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 500;
For delivery through Shipping & Handling Charges extra: Rs. 500 +Shipping & Handling Charges extra
ThemesCorporate Governance / Board-CEO Relationship /
Management Control
|
Case Length |
: |
17 Pages |
Period |
: |
2010-2012 |
Organization |
: |
Berkshire Hathaway |
Pub Date |
: |
2012 |
Teaching Note |
: |
Not Available |
Countries
|
: |
US; Global |
Industry |
: |
Conglomerate |
Abstract:
Berkshire Hathaway (Berkshire), a conglomerate having roughly 80 subsidiaries as of March 2011, and, which generated superior returns for shareholders, is a prime example of such blue chip entities. Berkshire was equally known for the famed personality of its head, Warren Buffett (Buffett), who believed in a hands-off style of management and gave unfettered freedom to the heads of the subsidiaries to operate their respective businesses the way they wanted, subject to the conglomerate's reputation not being compromised. Buffett’s laissez-faire approach could be gauged from the fact that the conglomerate whose turnover for financial year 2010 was around US $136 billion had, as of April 2011, just 21 employees at its head office to administer its 257,000 employees.
|
|
The case describes some of the issues in the company's history since the second half of the previous decade such as issues related to internal trading, audit-related issues, Buffett's inconsistent stand on derivatives, and issues related to Berkshire's investment in Bank of America. Some experts were of the opinion that these corporate governance issues at Berkshire would not have cropped up if Berkshire had not been unduly dependent on Buffett and if Berkshire's independent directors had actually been independent and acted as such. The questions on the independence of the board was considered all the more urgent in case of Berkshire, a conglomerate where Buffett's was the last word and whose returns since 2010 had been trailing the benchmark Standard & Poor's 500 index. This case is meant for MBA/MS students as a part of the Corporate Governance/ Management Control Systems curriculum.
Issues:
» Understand the connection between robust internal control and compliance mechanisms and organizational performance.
» Understand the role played by independent directors in ensuring effective corporate governance.
» Analyze the extent to which trust can play a role superior to that of formal checks and balances.
» Understand the relative importance of organizational reputation and its performance.
» Discuss whether circumventing internal control mechanisms for the sake of agility are justified.
Contents:
Keywords:
Corporate Governance; Independence of the board; Board’s relationship with CEO; Controlling; Management control systems; Compliance; Control mechanisms; Conglomerate; Management style; Laissez-faire management approach; Insider trading; ethics; Berkshire Hathaway; Warren Buffett
Introduction
- Next Page>>
|
|