The Google IPO
|
|
ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection
To download The Google IPO case study
(Case Code: FINC037) click on the button below, and select the case from the list of available cases:
» Finance Case
Studies
» Short Case Studies
» View Detailed Pricing Info
» How To Order This Case » Business Case Studies » Case Studies by Area
» Case Studies by Industry
» Case Studies by Company
Please note:
This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
Chat with us
Please leave your feedback
|
Case Details: |
Price: |
Case Code |
: |
FINC037 |
For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 400;
For delivery through courier (within India): Rs. 400 + Shipping & Handling Charges extra
ThemesIPO |
Case Length |
: |
14 Pages |
Period |
: |
1985 - 2004 |
Pub. Date |
: |
2004 |
Teaching Note |
: |
Available |
Organization |
: |
Google |
Industry |
: |
Internet Search |
Countries |
: |
Global |
Abstract:
Google went public on August 19, 2004, using the "Dutch Auction" method. Ever since the announcement on the IPO was made in April 2004, the IPO became mired in some controversy or other. On the one hand, it was a much-awaited IPO -- most IPOs
had not performed well in 2004, so investors were eagerly looking forward to the
Google IPO as Google was a highly profitable company. On the other hand, most
investment bankers had expressed their concerns about the IPO and had declared
it to be a failure even before its launch. Many bankers said that though Google
was profitable at that point, it would not remain so for very long because its
competitors - Yahoo and Microsoft -- were gaining fast on it.
|
|
Google's dual share system also came in for
criticism. This system, considered antiquated, was described by
most investors as unfair. Just a week before the launch of the
IPO, Google's founders, Sergey Brin and Larry Page violated the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission by breaking the "quiet period". Another violation that SEC discovered was Google's failure to report the shares that it had issued to its employees and consultants in the period September 2001 and July 2004.
These issues heightened the controversies surrounding the IPO. Unnerved by these controversies, Brin and Page declared just a day before the launch, that the price of shares had been reduced to $85 and $95. The number of shares available was also cut down.
However, all these controversies notwithstanding, the Google IPO performed exceedingly well. It helped the company to collect $1.4 billion, and put Google's valuation at nearly $30 billion. The success of the IPO effectively silenced all its detractors.
Issues:
» The "Dutch Auction" method of launching an IPO
» The difference betweeen the conventional IPO launch and the "Dutch Auction" launch and the advantages and drawbacks of both the systems
» The behavior of investors and investment bankers before the launch of an IPO
» The features of the IPO that are generally under the scrutiny of investors
» How controversies before an IPO launch can be harmful to a company
» The nature and mechanism of Google's working and operations
Contents:
Keywords:
Google, Initial Public Offering (IPO), Netscape, "Dutch Auction", Larry Page, Sergey Brin, Search engine, AOL, Ask Jeeves, Froogle, Investment Banks, Credit Suisse First Boston (CSFB), Morgan Stanley, Dual share structure and Technology IPOs
The Google IPO
- Next Page>>
|
|