Winner - the 'Dark Side Case Competition' at the Academy of Management (AOM) Annual Meeting 2015, at Vancouver, Canada

What's Good for the Goose is Good for the Gander?

What's Good for the Goose is Good for the Gander?
Case Code: BECG150
Case Length: 9 Pages
Period: 2013 - 2015
Pub Date: 2017
Teaching Note: Available
Price: Rs.300
Organization: The New York Times
Industry: Media, Newspaper
Countries: US
Themes: Business Ethics, Organizational Behavior
What's Good for the Goose is Good for the Gander?
Abstract Case Intro

Introduction

In 2014, The New York Times (NYT) fired Jill Abramson (Abramson), its executive editor who had served the paper since 1997, and replaced her with the managing editor, Dean Baquet. Eyebrows were raised when the publisher of the company, Arthur Sulzberger Jr., announced Abramson’s departure without giving the exact reasons for the decision. The decision to fire Abramson, the first woman executive editor of the newspaper in its 160-year-old history, led to the company facing accusations of gender disparity coming in from certain quarters. The high profile exit also raised concerns on issues related to women at the workplace and in leadership positions. According to Amanda Bennett, a journalist and author, and former editor of the Philadelphia Inquirer, “[W]hatever the facts of Abramson’s departure, it exposed in a raw way the reservoirs of resentment, hurt, and mistrust that women feel at work.” In addition to raising questions on gender disparity, critics contended that the issue highlighted how behavior and management styles that were considered acceptable for men became questionable where women at the workplace were concerned...

Exhibits

Exhibit I: Board of Directors at NYT
Exhibit II: The Executive Team at NYT

Buy this case study (Please select any one of the payment options)

Price: Rs.300
Price: Rs.300
PayPal (7 USD)

Custom Search