|
Search for Cases |
|
Case Details |
|
Case Code: MKTG379
|
Case Length: 18 Pages |
Period: 2007-2017 |
Pub Date: 2018 |
Teaching Note: Available |
Price:Rs.500 |
Organization : Lyft Inc. |
Industry : Ride-Sharing
|
Countries : US |
Themes: Brand Management/Services Marketing |
|
|
|
Lyft Vs Uber: Is Lyft Being `Woke` Enough to Beat Uber? |
|
|
|
ABSTRACT |
|
This case is about the rivalry between Lyft, Inc. (Lyft) and Uber Technologies Inc. (Uber) in the US ride sharing space. It focuses on Lyft’s (Lyft) strategy to project itself as socially aware or ‘woke’ in order to take a lead over Uber. The case starts out by giving a brief background of Lyft and the motive of its founders in setting up the company. It then delves into the similarities and differences between Lyft and Uber. The case describes in detail the various misdemeanors and controversies surrounding Uber that enabled Lyft to take measures to present itself as a nicer company. It also gives the industry viewpoint on the possibility of Lyft overtaking Uber on the basis of a better brand image. The case concludes with a look into the prospects and future strategies of Lyft in the ride sharing space.. |
|
|
or |
|
or |
PayPal (11 USD)
|
|
|
|
Issues |
The case is structured to achieve the following teaching objectives: |
|
- Explore the various methods of differentiating a service
|
|
- Analyze the impact of brand image on market growth
|
|
- Evaluate the competitive advantage of a service
|
|
|
Keywords |
Uber,Lyft,Services Marketing,Service Evaluation,Strategies for Services Marketing,Differentiation,Brand Image,Delivering Services,Creating Brand Image,Brand Elements,Brand Equity,Second Mover Advantage,Brand Positioning,Scandals,Ride Sharing |
INTRODUCTION
- Next Page>>
|
|
|