Search for Cases

Case Details

Case Code: ECON068
Case Length: 17 Pages 
Period: 2009-2018   
Pub Date: 2018
Teaching Note:Not Available
Price:Rs.500
Organization :Intel Corporation
Industry :Computers, IT and ITeS
Countries : Europe
Themes: Market Structure/Business Environment/Competition/Business Law
Case Studies  
Business Strategy
Marketing
Finance
Human Resource Management
IT and Systems
Operations
Economics
Leadership & Entrepreneurship

Intel Corporation`s European Union Antitrust Case

 

ABSTRACT

 
The case discusses the eight-year-long battle between the world’s largest semiconductor company, Intel Corporation (Intel) and the European Union (EU). In 2009, the European Commission (EC) had imposed a € 1.06 billion fine on Intel for violating the antitrust policies of the EU. The EC alleged that Intel had abused its monopoly in the computer microprocessors market by coercing manufacturers to purchase all their chips from Intel instead of rivals such as Advanced Micro Devices (AMD). After the EC handed down the fine on Intel, in 2014, the chipmaker appealed to the General Court stating that the fine was huge. However, in June 2014, the General Court upheld the € 1.06 billion fine against Intel stating that the penalty was proportionate to Intel’s anticompetitive practices. In August 2014, Intel appealed to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), the EU’s top court, to overturn the General Court’s decision. In September 2017, the CJEU ruled that the General Court could re-examine the fine against the company. The CJEU in its ruling decided in the case of Intel, the ‘As-Efficient-Competitor’ (AEC) test should be properly evaluated by the General Court. The General Court had to look into Intel’s legal arguments more closely, giving a chance to Intel to have the antitrust fine reduced or annulled. .
 
Economics Case Studies | Case Study in Management, Operations, Strategies, Business Environment, Case Studies
or
Economics Case Studies | Case Study in Management, Operations, Strategies, Business Environment, Case Studies
or
PayPal (11 USD)

 

Issues

The case is structured to achieve the following teaching objectives:
  • Analyze the antitrust allegations against Intel and the company’s response thereof.
  • Understand the market structure of the chips market and discuss and debate whether Intel was creating a monopoly in the PC and server microprocessors market.
  • Understand the importance of companies operating in foreign countries knowing the rules of competition.
  • Discuss the legal and ethical issues related to the case.
Contents
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND NOTE
COMPETITION BETWEEN INTEL AND AMD
INTEL’S INITIAL TROUBLES WITH THE EC
EC REOPENS THE PROBE
EC ISSUES SUPPLEMETARY STATEMENT OF OBJECTIONS
INTEL APPEALS TO THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
EC FINES INTEL
INTEL APPEALS TO THE GENERAL COURT
INTEL MOVES TO THE CJEU
THE ROAD AHEAD
EXHIBITS

Keywords

Market structure; Monopoly; Duopoly; Competition; Anticompetitive practices; Antitrust laws; Discounts; Exclusivity rebates; Business environment; Business law; Ethics; ‘As-Efficient-Competitor’ (AEC) test; Intel; AMD; Europe

INTRODUCTION - Next Page>>